Thursday, 15 April 2021
Smash-Up, the Story of a Woman (Stuart Heisler, 1947)
Wednesday, 14 April 2021
The Age of Innocence: American Cinema's Studio Era Revisited (2021)
عصر معصومیت |
کتاب «عصر معصومیت: بازخوانی سینمای استودیویی آمریکا» منتشر
شده و باید در کتابفروشیها و در سایتهای اینترتی برای خرید آنلاین نسخۀ چاپی
موجود باشد.
این کتاب اول از مجموعهای است که توسط نیما حسنینسب
سردبیری میشود. او پشت جلد این کتاب نوشته:
«حکایتِ نامها و فیلمها و روایتِ شیوهها و مسیرهای فیلمسازی
در کارخانه رویاسازی هالیوود هم لذتبخش است و هم راهگشا؛ چه برای آنها که میخواهند
آثار تاریخسازِ آن روزگار را بهتر تماشا و درک کنند و چه کسانی که قصد دارند از این
گنجینه برای ورود به کار سینما پشت و جلوی دوربین بهره ببرند و از میراث بهجامانده
استفاده کنند تا مسیر دشوار و دلپذیرِ «سینهفیل تا سینهاست» هموارتر شود.
جلد اول از مجموعه «دفترهای سینهفیلیا» دربارهی چند كارگردان
سینمای آمریكا از پایان عصر صامت تا دورهی مصادف با زوال سینمای كلاسیک
آمریكا در اواخر دههی ۱۹۵۰ است. احسان خوشبخت با پیشینهی سالها تحقیق و بررسی
سینمای آمریکا مثل نقالهای خودمان یا بونشیهای سینمای ژاپن انگار کنار پرده نقرهای
ایستاده و دارد چیزهای مهم و جذاب و دستاولی از زندگی و کارنامه چند نام بزرگ و مهمِ
یک دوران سپریشده را توصیف میکند؛ از جان فورد و اورسن ولز و رائول والش تا ادگار
اولمر و دبلیو اس ون دایک مشهور به وودی یکبرداشته و همچنین زنان کارگردان مطرح در
نظام استودیویی که شرحِ موجز سازوكار تولیدشان در فصلی دیگر از کتاب آمده است. بخش
پیوست این جلد مروری است بر پانتئون سینمایی معروفِ اندرو ساریس که هنوز از مهمترین
منابع برای شناخت و دستهبندی کارگردانهای هالیوودی در دوران طلایی است؛ فهرست و
توصیفهایی که میتواند نقشه راه مناسبی برای سینهفیلهای سرگردان در اقیانوسِ دسترسی
دیجیتال به آثار تاریخ سینما باشد.» — نیما حسنینسب
شرح عکس روی جلد: استودیوی ساموئل گلدوین پشتصحنۀ ما دوباره
زندگی میکنیم (1934) به کارگردانی روبن مامولیان (نشسته مقابل دوربین) با بازی
فردریک مارچ و آنا استن. پشت دوربین هم گِرِگ تولند نشسته؛ چند سال پیش از این که
همشهری کین را فیلمبرداری کند
Sunday, 4 April 2021
The Star (Stuart Heisler, 1952)
Tuesday, 30 March 2021
Revolution, Televised
This article was commissioned by the Iranian documentary streaming website, DocuNight. The programme dedicated to films about Iranian revolution featuring an array of thoughtfully selected titles is still live and many of them are seeing their internet premiere. Highly recommended. — Ehsan Khoshbakht
It has happened more than once. While speaking with documentary filmmakers of a certain generation (Med Hondo, one of the greatest African filmmakers, for one) I have been told how much they would have loved to go to Iran in 1978 to film, document and report back on the revolution as it was happening – followed by an expression of regret, that they couldn’t get into the country. This conversational turn has been repeated often enough that when that great documentarian of our time, Jocelyne Saab, talked about wanting to shoot the Iranian revolution, I hastily and foolishly jumped ahead, saying “But you couldn’t get in, could you?” She gave me one of her calm smiles and replied: “I could, and I made a film about it – Iran, Utopia in the Making – which was shown on public television in Japan, Algeria, Sweden and Switzerland.”
Sunday, 7 March 2021
Filmfarsi — Streaming in the UK
Filmfarsi (dir: Ehsan Khoshbakht, 2019) will stream in the UK for free (though limited to 300 viewers only), as a part of Wales One World film festival, commencing from March 14, accessible until March 20, 2021.
(It can only be viewed in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey.)
Booking is essential and can be done here.
Wednesday, 20 January 2021
King of the Movies - A Henry King Documentary
Wednesday, 9 December 2020
The Deer (Masoud Kimiai, 1974)
The Deer plays at International Film Festival Rotterdam 2021.
For two consecutive decades and in various Iranian critics' poll, The Deer has occupied the very top place as "the best Iranian film ever made." Known for his rape/revenge drama Gheysar (1969)—which changed the course of Iranian cinema—director Masoud Kimiai (former assistant to Jean Negulescu and Samuel Khachikian) adds an explicitly political dimension to the story of his typically defiant characters. Here, in a nod to Hollywood's "buddy film," the familiar hero of Iranian popular cinema is prompted into social action, far beyond the usual romantic conquests. There is a sense of an imminent revolution in this story of a former champ turned junkie who reunites with a leftist classmate and is redeemed by revolutionary anger. Picking up where the anti-hero of Gheysar left, the leading character (Seyyed, played by versatile method actor Behrouz Vossoughi) again takes the law into his own hands and challenges the established order.
Friday, 4 December 2020
Philosophical Treatises of a Master Illusionist: A Conversation about Abbas Kiarostami
Abbas Kiarostami (1940-2016), arguably one of the the greatest of Iranian filmmakers, was a master of interruption and reduction in cinema. He, who passed away on Monday in a Paris hospital, diverted cinema from its course more than once. From his experimental children’s films to deconstructing the meaning of documentary and fiction, to digital experimentation, every move brought him new admirers and cost him some of his old ones. Kiarostami provided a style, a film language, with a valid grammar of its own.
On the occasion of this great loss, Jonathan Rosenbaum and I discussed some aspects of Kiarostami’s world. Jonathan, the former chief film critic at Chicago Reader, is the co-author (with Mehrnaz Saeed-Vafa) of a book on Kiarostami, available from the University of Chicago Press. – Ehsan Khoshbakht
* * *
Ehsan Khoshbakht: Abbas Kiarostami's impact on Iranian cinema was so colossal that almost swallowed up everything before, and to a certain extent after. For better or worse, Iranian cinema equated Abbas Kiarostami. It was good because it made Iranian cinema a global phenomenon. And not so good when it overshadowed other filmmakers and other existing modes of filmmaking in Iran. Can you think of any other filmmaker whose presence could have dominated a national cinema to such extent?
Jonathan Rosenbaum: As you know, I tend to view Kiarostami more in transnational terms. In terms of being identified with a national cinema from outside that particular nation, I suppose one could cite Satyajit Ray, Almodovar, Bergman, and Kurosawa, among others. But from a transnational perspective, I suspect that the only figure comparable to Kiarostami, both in terms of influence and in terms of stirring up controversies, would be Godard. Godard himself apparently once said that the cinema that begins with Griffith ends with Kiarostami. For me, both directors excelled in creating global newspapers during separate decades -- Godard in the 60s, Kiarostami in the 90s. And people are still quarrelling about their formal procedures in comparable ways. Another parallel with Godard worth mentioning is the capacity of both filmmakers to keep reinventing themselves, in terms of audience, format, relation to narrative, and much else besides. You might even say that Godard and Kiarostami each have had as many "periods" as Picasso did.
Thursday, 26 November 2020
Dick Cavett Show: John Cassavetes, Peter Falk & Ben Gazzara
Husband (1970) |
Notes on the restored version of Dick Cavett Show: John Cassavetes/Peter Falk/Ben Gazzara (21 September 1970), screened at Il Cinema Ritrovato 2019. The entire programme, sourced from a VHS tape, can be viewed below. — EK
A notorious moment in television history, one which is both funny and embarrassing to watch. Dick Cavett's interviews with film personalities are usually precious; they can be casual (resulting in some hilarious moments with certain guests) but at the same time focused. In 1970, two years into its run, Cavett introduced a new, longer format show to coincide with football fixtures, when many TV viewers would be hooked to the sports channel. The first episode to follow this new format, featuring the leading talents of Husbands, made for a disastrous start. Everything that could go wrong with an interview (including the unlikely possibility of the guests taking off their socks on camera, rolling on the floor and wrestling) did go wrong. Seemingly intoxicated, Cassavetes, Gazzara and Falk refused to talk and when they did, it was in incomprehensible half-lines – the spirit of the Three Stooges channelled via three figures of the New American Cinema. Cavett leaves the set in protest, returning later with the audience clamouring, "We want Dick!" The three bad boys kneel in front of him, seemingly apologetic. Yet, five seconds later, the mischief resumes to a maddening intensity. Towards the end it becomes clearer to see that it's all more of an act than actual intoxication. It's up to you whether to see it as a mean attack on the shallowness of such TV shows, or a sign of troubling immaturity. (For further drunk interviewees at Il Cinema Ritrovato 2019, see Sterling Hayden in Pharos of Chaos.)
Monday, 16 November 2020
His name was Negahdar Jamali...
نگهدار جمالی،
سینمادوست، مبلّغ سینما و فیلمساز خودآموختۀ شیرازی که برای فیلمهای ویدئویی
وسترن، تارزانی و اکشنی که با کمک دوستان و هممحلههایش می ساخت، اول در شیراز و بعد به لطف مستند
کامران حیدری، «من نگهدار جمالی وسترن میسازم»، در سطحی جهان به شهرتی کوچک
رسیده بو،د شب پنجشنبه، 22 آبان، بر اثر ابتلا به کرونا فوت کرد.
این خبر را کامران
حیدری مستندساز تأیید کرد که قصد داشت فیلم دیگری با مرحوم نگهدار بسازد.
تماشاگران بینالمللی
با وجد فراوان «من نگهدار جمالی وسترن میسازم» را در لندن و نیویورک و شهرهای دیگر دیدند و به
دنیای ساده اما دیوانهوار این وسترنباز شیرازی خندیدند، نه از سر تمسخر، بلکه از
سر همراهی با شیدایی او و ایمانش به کاری که میکرد.
وقتی اولین بار این فیلم را دیدم، نگهدار را رومانتیکی یافتم که شکستهای متعددش چیزی از عشقش به سینما نکاسته و دربارهاش نوشتم «نگهدار جمالي يكي از وجدآورترين فيلمهاي سال 2013 است كه ميتواند هر بينندهاي را تحت تأثير قرار دهد و فقر فيلمهاي اين مؤلف شيرازي ناخودآگاه او را به وسترنهاي اوليه ادگار اولمر پيوند ميدهد.»