![]() |
| The Leopard |
Saturday, 2 November 2013
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
Monday, 28 October 2013
On Bridges-Go-Around (1958)
Bridges-Go-Around (1958), made by
one of the forerunner Jazz Film artists of all time, Shirley Clarke, is a
short film, or more precisely two shorts in one. Composed of a series
of shots from New York bridges, the film, in its first half, is edited
and synced with the music of Teo Macero.
For the second half, the very same images, as the first half, are
repeated, but this time they are accompanied by the electronic music of Louis and Bebe Barron. So Bridges-Go-Around
is a film which is played twice, but each projection, thanks to
specific effects created by each musical genre, gives a distinctive
impression and even the meaning of the images change and assiduously
contrast/complete/comment on the other half.
Tuesday, 22 October 2013
Journey Through Iranian Cinema with Mark Cousins
Last year I made a documentary about Iranian cinema through the refreshing eyes of Mark Cousins. A Journey Through Iranian Cinema with Mark Cousins is a small road movie about Iranian cinema and Mark's multiple journeys to my country that thanks to my good friend Mehrnaz Saeed-Vafa (and John Sinno of Typecast Films) was distributed in North America and recently was shown in two film festivals in Canada (Toronto) and the US (my favorite unvisited city, New Orleans).
Now the good news is that the film will be screened at the University of London's SOAS, on the last day of October, followed by a Q&A with me and Mark (on Skype from Scotland). I'm shy, moody and not a good talker, but I'm sure Mark has many stories to tell from his various trips to Iran and his interviews and films with and about filmmakers such as Abbas Kiarostami, Jafar Panahi, Mohsen and Samira Makhmalbaf and many more.
You would find more information on SOAS' website.
Hope to see you there!
Ehsan
Pandora's Tape: Beckett, Pinter and Cinephilia
بكت، پينتر و
سينهفيليا
جعبۀ پاندورا
آخرين نوار كِرپ، مطالعهاي در حافظه، تنهايي و مرگ، عنوان نمايشنامهاي از ساموئل بكت (1958)
و آخرين نقشآفرينيِ هرولد پينتر، به عنوان بازيگر، در مقابل دوربين تلويزيون
(2006) است. پينتر نقش پيرمرد 69 سالهاي را بازي ميكند كه در روز تولدش نوارهاي
صداي خودش را كه در سالهاي دور ضبط كرده دوباره گوش ميكند. نوارها را زير و رو
ميكند. يادداشتهايش را كه پوستۀ سفيد كاغذشان حالا به قهوهاي ميزند اين ور و
آن ور ميكند. سعي ميكند از شنيدن آنها طفره برود و پشت ميز بزرگ كافكايياش بيتحرك
بماند، درست مثل ژان لويي ترنتينيانِ عشق، بعد از مرگ امانوئل ريوا. كرپ بيتحرك
ميماند، اما پخش نوارها تصاويري دردناك از گذشته را جلوي چشمش رژه ميبرند. آنچه
در اين نوارها ترسناك است، شور زندگي است كه حالا به خاكستر نشسته و از آن ترسناكتر
حضور عميق و فاجعهبار عدمرضايت يا دلزدگي از خود است. كرپ 69 ساله با تحقير از
كرپ 39 ساله ياد ميكند و در نوار صداي كرپ 39 ساله او كرپِ نوجوان ايدهآليست و
خوابزده را نكوهش ميكند.
پينتر حضوري با
ابهت و بيمناك در اين تلهتئاتر دارد، شايد به خاطر ايمان و عشقش به بكت كه به
قول خودش هر چه بيشتر اين ايرلندي دماغش را در لجن فرو ميكند، بيشتر از او
سپاسگذار ميشود. شايد درون شخصيت كرپ اين خود پينتر باشد كه با وقوف به مرگ قريبالوقوعش
از سرطان و در قدمهاي لنگلنگانش حول و حوش گور با صراحتي به تلخي و بُرندگي زبانِ بكتْ زندگياش و فضاي تهي و سياه عظيم پشت سرش
را پيش از عزيمت به تهي و سياهِ پيشِ رو مرور ميكند.
Thursday, 17 October 2013
Cinephilia Translated, Part 3
![]() |
| Hitchcock/Truffaut in Farsi: 4th edition (out of six or seven) |
For the previous posts [here and here] about translating Anglo-American or French film culture in Iran, I mostly focused on journals. Now I would elaborate more on the unauthorized translation of the major and minor film books.
The rules of the game are more or less similar to those of journals. The names who make it to the translations are a combination of current trends (Slavoj Žižek), cult figures (Jean-Luc Godard) and the essential texts (David Bordwell/Kristin Thompson).
The translators are whether the per-revolutionary cinephiles, now trying to retain the memories of a cinephilic haven via written text, or a new generation of one-off, clandestine translators who are often young university graduates, showing their passion for a filmmaker
or writer by translating them. The latter group always starts on
its own, without having a contract or handshake with the publisher, and of course with no guarantee on
publishing the finished work or passing the labyrinth of censorship.
Is there any financial motivation behind this? Based on some statistics, personal observations and conversations with those who do it, I would say no, at least, for the translator who is always the sole driving force behind this cultural reproduction. The publishing industry in any format, whether book or journal, has been one of the key victims of the post-sanction Iran, if not mentioning the ruined economy of Ahmadinejad's Iran. During the eight year of Ahmadinejad's presidency, the systematic rape of the culture was facilitated by eliminating subsidies to the cultural products. One of the first outcomes was a sudden increase in the price of paper. This affected the publishing industry to the extent that the number of book readers went down the lowest in recent history.
To make sure that the publishers are completely defeated, censor was tightened to its most suffocating in recent memory. "We specialize in art and literature," says Farkhondeh Hajizadeh, an Iranian writer and publisher, "that's exactly the area that's problematic for officials, not physics and chemistry. Our books have been either banned, or they have faced censorship after a year, or they remain suspended." [1] In addition to that, just recently, the licence of some of the publishers who had expertise in publishing film books, like Nashr-e Cheshmeh, was suspended or revoked. This new decision by censorship was similar to what happened to Jafar Panahi: it's better to dry the fountain rather than monitoring and censoring every drop of water coming out of it.
To make sure that the publishers are completely defeated, censor was tightened to its most suffocating in recent memory. "We specialize in art and literature," says Farkhondeh Hajizadeh, an Iranian writer and publisher, "that's exactly the area that's problematic for officials, not physics and chemistry. Our books have been either banned, or they have faced censorship after a year, or they remain suspended." [1] In addition to that, just recently, the licence of some of the publishers who had expertise in publishing film books, like Nashr-e Cheshmeh, was suspended or revoked. This new decision by censorship was similar to what happened to Jafar Panahi: it's better to dry the fountain rather than monitoring and censoring every drop of water coming out of it.
Saturday, 5 October 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)





